Docs: Added freeze question

This commit is contained in:
Paul Beckingham 2016-02-29 13:58:46 -05:00
parent bad0c5a201
commit a7aa4209b8

View file

@ -183,16 +183,20 @@ associated metadata:
- Do we need arbitrary exclusions? Lunch? Dentist Appointment? or are those
just different inclusions?
- Suppose “last week” is 39 hours of nothing, and 1 hour of a meeting. The
- Suppose "last week" is 39 hours of nothing, and 1 hour of a meeting. The
question becomes what do the following do:
[1] $ timew track last week “paint the thing”
[2] $ timew track last week “paint the thing” :fill
[1] $ timew track last week "paint the thing"
[2] $ timew track last week "paint the thing" :fill
Our choices are:
[a] 39 hours of “paint the thing” filled around the 1 hour “meeting”.
[b] 40 hours of “paint the thing” overlapping with 1 hour “meeting”
[c] 40 hours of “paint the thing”, and the meeting is gone
[a] 39 hours of "paint the thing" filled around the 1 hour "meeting".
[b] 40 hours of "paint the thing" overlapping with 1 hour "meeting"
[c] 40 hours of "paint the thing", and the meeting is gone
Consensus: [b], but configurable.
- The command 'timew freeze before yesterday' or 'timew freeze tag1', where
'freeze' could equally be 'lock', could be used to prevent subsequent
modifications. There would need to be a symmetrical 'unfreeze'/'unlock'.