docs: Document TW #2422

This commit is contained in:
Tomas Babej 2021-09-25 19:11:47 -04:00
parent 2ad7321132
commit d19ee12406
2 changed files with 4 additions and 0 deletions

View file

@ -90,6 +90,8 @@
Thanks to emkamau. Thanks to emkamau.
- TW #2403 Undefined symbols (with -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON) - TW #2403 Undefined symbols (with -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON)
Thanks to Jan Palus for contributing. Thanks to Jan Palus for contributing.
- TW #2422 "eow" and "eonw" seem to use different week day as reference
Thanks to bgravato for reporting.
- TW #2428 The "edit" command should respect "bulk" configuration option - TW #2428 The "edit" command should respect "bulk" configuration option
Thanks to Evan Edmond. Thanks to Evan Edmond.
- TW #2442 Bulk completions generate nagging message even if highest urgency - TW #2442 Bulk completions generate nagging message even if highest urgency

2
NEWS
View file

@ -94,6 +94,8 @@ Fixed regressions in 2.6.0
- The "end of <date>" named dates ('eod', 'eow', ...) were pointing to the - The "end of <date>" named dates ('eod', 'eow', ...) were pointing to the
first second of the next day, instead of last second of the referenced first second of the next day, instead of last second of the referenced
interval. This was a regression introduced in 2.5.2. interval. This was a regression introduced in 2.5.2.
- The "eow" and "eonw" were using a different weekday as a reference. This
was a regeression introduced in 2.5.2.
- The rc.verbose=<value> configuration override was applied only if it were - The rc.verbose=<value> configuration override was applied only if it were
the first configuration override. In #2247, this manifested itself as the first configuration override. In #2247, this manifested itself as
inability to supress footnotes about the overrides, and in #1953 as failure inability to supress footnotes about the overrides, and in #1953 as failure